Mosher v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2014 Ark. 450
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 30, 2014
DocketCV-14-855
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ark. 450 (Mosher v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosher v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2014 Ark. 450 (Ark. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. 450

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-855

CHRISTINA MOSHER Opinion Delivered October 30, 2014 APPELLANT

V. MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR CHILD

APPELLEES GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Appellant Christina Mosher, by and through her attorney, Aaron Hill, has filed a

motion for rule on clerk. On June 17, 2014, the circuit court entered an order terminating

Mosher’s parental rights, and Mosher timely filed a notice of appeal on July 8, 2014. Pursuant

to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(d) (2014), Mosher’s record was due by September 16,

2014; however, the record was not tendered to this court’s clerk until September 19, 2014.

Mr. Hill was notified that the tendered record was untimely, and a motion for rule on clerk

was needed. Accordingly, he has filed the instant motion on Mosher’s behalf.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated

appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said:

Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault Cite as 2014 Ark. 450

where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires

an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly

admit fault where he or she has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal.

See id. When it is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under

either rule based on error or good reason, the relief will be granted. See id. If there is

attorney error, a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional

Conduct. See id.

It is plain from the motion and record before us that there was error on Mr. Hill’s part

in failing to file a timely record. Pursuant to McDonald, supra, we grant Mosher’s motion for

rule on clerk and forward a copy of this opinion to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Aaron Scott Hill, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. State
146 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosher-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-ark-2014.