Mosgeller v. August Feine & Sons Co.
176 A.D. 949
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1917
StatusPublished
This text of 176 A.D. 949 (Mosgeller v. August Feine & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mosgeller v. August Feine & Sons Co., 176 A.D. 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that while the charge of the court respecting the moral obligation of the defendant to care for the child was improper under the-circumstances of this case, it was not so prejudicial as to require a new trial. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosgeller-v-august-feine-sons-co-nyappdiv-1917.