Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Moses v. Woodbury

Moses v. Woodbury

54 A.D.2d 961, 389 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 961 (Moses v. Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moses v. Woodbury, 54 A.D.2d 961, 389 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Ethel Woodbury appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 12, 1976, as denied the branch of her motion which sought "to secure authorizations for the medical records of a Dr. Parkes”, a physician who allegedly treated plaintiff Donnie Moses and who will not be called as a witness by said plaintiff. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the branch of appellant’s motion which sought to secure authorizations for examining the records of Dr. Parkes granted. Plaintiff Donnie Moses’ time to furnish said authorizations is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The generally accepted liberal interpretation of CPLR article 31 compels the conclusion that the medical reports sought are material and relevant (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 NY2d 403). Inasmuch as the provisions of the CPLR take precedence over any rules of this court, it cannot be successfully contended that 22A NYCRR 672.2 is authority for denying appellant the relief which she seeks. The claim that the authorizations were already given was not raised at Trial Term and is not supported by the record on this appeal; therefore, it is not properly before this court. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moreno v. Greater New York Dental Administrators, Inc.
120 A.D.2d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Shapiro v. Levine
104 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Skylab Realty Corp. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
96 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Arnold v. New City Condominiums Corp.
88 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hoenig v. Westphal
422 N.E.2d 491 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Calhoun v. Pickett
77 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Ricciuti v. Town of Schaghticoke
104 Misc. 2d 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Dale v. Sherman
75 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Brewer v. Jamaica Hospital
73 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Bosico v. Mertzel
71 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Baker v. Younts
96 Misc. 2d 132 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Catalano v. Long Island Jewish Hospital
93 Misc. 2d 695 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1978)
Mendelson v. Shein
58 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Sito v. Neumann
92 Misc. 2d 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 961, 389 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-woodbury-nyappdiv-1976.