Moses v. Sumner

241 A.D.2d 948, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896

This text of 241 A.D.2d 948 (Moses v. Sumner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moses v. Sumner, 241 A.D.2d 948, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Gilbert, J.). We add only that the record does not support the contention of respondent that the file of Family Court was not transferred to Supreme Court when the case was transferred pursuant to a “Family Court Action Plan”. Because, however, the order on appeal is a Supreme Court order, it was improperly filed in Family Court and must be refiled in Supreme Court, Herkimer County (see, Matter of Dorie v Hyde, 227 AD2d 915). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Gilbert, J.— Custody.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorie v. Hyde
227 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 948, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-sumner-nyappdiv-1997.