Moses v. Sumner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moses v. Sumner

241 A.D.2d 948, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1997·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Gilbert, J.). We add only that the record does not support the contention of respondent that the file of Family Court was not transferred to Supreme Court when the case was transferred pursuant to a “Family Court Action Plan”. Because, however, the order on appeal is a Supreme Court order, it was improperly filed in Family Court and must be refiled in Supreme Court, Herkimer County (see, Matter of Dorie v Hyde, 227 AD2d 915). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Gilbert, J.— Custody.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Gilbert, J.). We add only that the record does not support the contention of respondent that the file of Family Court was not transferred to Supreme Court when the case was transferred pursuant to a “Family Court Action Plan”. Because, however, the order on appeal is a Supreme Court order, it was improperly filed in Family Court and must be refiled in Supreme Court, Herkimer County (see, Matter of Dorie v Hyde, 227 AD2d 915). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Gilbert, J.— Custody.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Moses v. Sumner, 241 A.D.2d 948, 663 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

241 A.D.2d 948 (Moses v. Sumner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related