Moses v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moses v. State

541 S.W.3d 713

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 2018

DocketED 105670

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 713 (Moses v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moses v. State, 541 S.W.3d 713 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ted G. Moses, III ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his *714motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ted G. Moses, III ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his *714motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-state-moctapp-2018.