Moses v. State

331 S.W.3d 740, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2011 WL 601615
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 22, 2011
DocketED 94949
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 331 S.W.3d 740 (Moses v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moses v. State, 331 S.W.3d 740, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2011 WL 601615 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Moses appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGee v. State
331 S.W.3d 740 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 S.W.3d 740, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2011 WL 601615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-state-moctapp-2011.