Moses v. State
65 Miss. 56
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The manifest purpose of sections 1085 et seq. was to preclude the performance of any act in this State pertaining to the business of insurance by any foreign insurance company which has not complied with the laws of the State.
As the State may prohibit a foreign insurance company from doing business within its limits as held in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 169, it must have the right to make its prohibition effective by penal enactments as contained in the sections mentioned.'
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moses v. State, 65 Miss. 56 (Mich. 1887).
65 Miss. 56 (Moses v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swing v. Brister
40 So. 146 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1905)
Cowan v. London Assurance Corp.
73 Miss. 321 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)