Moses v. State

103 S.E. 191, 25 Ga. App. 330, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 786
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1920
Docket11345
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 191 (Moses v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moses v. State, 103 S.E. 191, 25 Ga. App. 330, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 786 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Tho evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the offense was committed in Macon county.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the judge to instruct the jury upon the subject of impeachment of witnesses is not error, unless a timely and appropriate written request therefor has been presented.

3. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to set aside the finding 'of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Indictment for larceny; from Macon superior court — Judge Littlejohn. January 7, 1920. Jere M. Moore, John B. Guerry, for plaintiff in error. Jule Felton, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 191, 25 Ga. App. 330, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-state-gactapp-1920.