Moses v. State
51 S.E. 503, 123 Ga. 504, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 513
Opinion
1. “ No question as to the legal sufficiency of an indictment can be properly raised in a motion for a new trial.” Womble v. State, 107 Ga. 666; Boswell v. State, 114 Ga. 40.
2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moses v. State, 51 S.E. 503, 123 Ga. 504, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 513 (Ga. 1905).
51 S.E. 503 (Moses v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seymour v. State
77 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Gossitt v. State
186 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Waldrop v. State
171 S.E. 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Reeves v. State
143 S.E. 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)