Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Moses v. State

Moses v. State

940 S.W.2d 496, 328 Ark. 103, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 211
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 7, 1997·No. CR 96-680·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Timothy Moses, by his attorney, Richard H. Young, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney “excepts full responsibility for the late filing.” We assume he means he “accepts” responsibility for the error.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moses v. State, 940 S.W.2d 496, 328 Ark. 103, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 211 (Ark. 1997).

940 S.W.2d 496 (Moses v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)