Moses v. Moses

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moses v. Moses

279 So. 2d 370, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7996

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 1973·No. No. 72-700·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and having considered the briefs of the parties we are of the opinion that the final judgment should be affirmed based upon the appellant’s failure to demonstrate reversible error; except that that portion of the final judgment requiring appellant to maintain insurance on his life for the benefit of his former wife and to make her an irrevocable beneficiary is erroneous. See Putman v. Putman, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 717.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed in all respects except as heretofore noted and the cause remanded to the chancellor for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and having considered the briefs of the parties we are of the opinion that the final judgment should be affirmed based upon the appellant’s failure to demonstrate reversible error; except that that portion of the final judgment requiring appellant to maintain insurance on his life for the benefit of his former wife and to make her an irrevocable beneficiary is erroneous. See Putman v. Putman, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 717.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed in all respects except as heretofore noted and the cause remanded to the chancellor for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Moses v. Moses, 279 So. 2d 370, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

279 So. 2d 370 (Moses v. Moses) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related