Moses v. Moses

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moses v. Moses

279 So. 2d 370, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7996

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 27, 1973

DocketNo. 72-700

StatusPublished

This text of 279 So. 2d 370 (Moses v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moses v. Moses, 279 So. 2d 370, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and having considered the briefs of the parties we are of the opinion that the final judgment should be affirmed based upon the appellant’s failure to demonstrate reversible error; except that that portion of the final judgment requiring appellant to maintain insurance on his life for the benefit of his former wife and to make her an irrevocable beneficiary is erroneous. See Putman v. Putman, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 717.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed in all respects except as heretofore noted and the cause remanded to the chancellor for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI