Moses v. Gunn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Moses v. Gunn

1 Root 307

DecidedAugust 15, 1791

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 307 (Moses v. Gunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moses v. Gunn, 1 Root 307 (Colo. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

In a qui tam prosecution for an assault and battery committed upon the wife, it was determined, that depositions taken out of court pursuant to the statute, are admissible in actions of qui tarn. Also determined, that depositions taken in this state within twenty miles of the adverse party, who lives out of the state, are not legally taken, unless notice is given. Whiting and Frisbie v. Jewet, Kirby’s Rep. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a qui tam prosecution for an assault and battery committed upon the wife, it was determined, that depositions taken out of court pursuant to the statute, are admissible in actions of qui tarn. Also determined, that depositions taken in this state within twenty miles of the adverse party, who lives out of the state, are not legally taken, unless notice is given. Whiting and Frisbie v. Jewet, Kirby’s Rep. 1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-gunn-conn-1791.