Moses v. Fitts

21 D.C. 97
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 17, 1892
DocketNo. 30,702
StatusPublished

This text of 21 D.C. 97 (Moses v. Fitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moses v. Fitts, 21 D.C. 97 (D.C. 1892).

Opinion

In the case of William H. Moses, survivor, &c., against Charles W. Fitts, administrator, a motion is made by the plaintiff to dismiss the defendant’s appeal because there is no record whatever on which said appeal could be heard. [98]*98We note that Gen; Mussey was counsel of record for the defendant in this case. He is deceased; and we think that the first step, before any other is taken, the party defendant having failed to cause counsel to enter their appearance, would be the filing of the motion, notice of which should be served upon the defendant, requiring him to employ new counsel.

We think this motion to dismiss should not be heard or disposed of until that is done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 D.C. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-fitts-dc-1892.