Moses v. Boston & Maine Railroad

79 A. 21, 76 N.H. 570, 1911 N.H. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 10, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no evidence of the usual practice in the matter in controversy, and the case must be decided upon the common knowledge of mankind upon the subject. So considering it, the defendants’ contention cannot be sustained. There is n.o statute requiring passengers to remain in a car until the station is announced, and it is not common knowledge that this is what the ordinary man would do.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moses v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 79 A. 21, 76 N.H. 570, 1911 N.H. LEXIS 206 (N.H. 1911).

79 A. 21 (Moses v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Currier v. Boston & Maine Railroad
97 A. 741 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)