Moses v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moses v. Board of Education

34 A.D.2d 1012, 314 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 1012 (Moses v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moses v. Board of Education, 34 A.D.2d 1012, 314 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to require appellants to reinstate respondent to her position as a teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings 'County, dated April 11, 1969, which granted the petition and directed that petitioner be restored to her position effective as of September, 1967. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The appellant Board of Education acted within its power in placing respondent on a leave of absence without pay pursuant to subdivision 7a of section 106 of the board’s by-laws (Matter of Brown v. Board of TSdue., 23 A D 2d 850, affd. 16 N Y 2d 1021; Matter of Stone v. Gross, 25 A D 2d 753, affd. 19 N Y 2d 675; Matter of Pantaleo v. Board of Edmc., 25 A D 2d 752). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [59 Misc 2d 318.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to require appellants to reinstate respondent to her position as a teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings 'County, dated April 11, 1969, which granted the petition and directed that petitioner be restored to her position effective as of September, 1967. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The appellant Board of Education acted within its power in placing respondent on a leave of absence without pay pursuant to subdivision 7a of section 106 of the board’s by-laws (Matter of Brown v. Board of TSdue., 23 A D 2d 850, affd. 16 N Y 2d 1021; Matter of Stone v. Gross, 25 A D 2d 753, affd. 19 N Y 2d 675; Matter of Pantaleo v. Board of Edmc., 25 A D 2d 752). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [59 Misc 2d 318.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 1012, 314 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moses-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack