Moses v. Blocher

Fourth Circuit

Moses v. Blocher

326 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2009·No. No. 09-6132·Published

Opinion

[228] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Lee Moses appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Blocker, No. 5:07-ct-03070-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[228] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Lee Moses appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Blocker, No. 5:07-ct-03070-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Moses v. Blocher, 326 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 227 (Moses v. Blocher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related