Moses v. Blocher

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 29, 2009
• Docket: 09-6132
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6132

EDWARD LEE MOSES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

M. BLOCHER; MICHAEL HARDEE; HUGH MARTIN, JR.; HATTIE B. PIMPONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03070-D)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Lee Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edward Lee Moses appeals the district court’s order

and judgment granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Moses v. Blocher, No. 5:07-ct-03070-D (E.D.N.C. Jan.

16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED