Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services

Fourth Circuit

Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services

542 F. App'x 295

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. No. 13-1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Madeline Leigh Moses appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Am. Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Servs., No. 7:12-cv-306-BO, 2013 WL 2948155 (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Madeline Leigh Moses appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Am. Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Servs., No. 7:12-cv-306-BO, 2013 WL 2948155 (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services, 542 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

542 F. App'x 295 (Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related