Moses Buchanan & Co. v. Marshall

22 Vt. 561
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided August 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[563]*563The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, J.

The defendant’s agreement, at the time of indorsing the note, to waive notice presupposes, that he did not intend to waive demand upon the maker ; and there is nothing in the case to excuse the demand upon the maker. The defendant was thereby discharged. There is no necessity to determine the other point in the case ; but there is a case in Pickering’s Reports, which decides, that, under such a state of facts, the indorser is exonerated by the naked agreement to wait, if in the mean time the maker or surety become insolvent.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moses Buchanan & Co. v. Marshall, 22 Vt. 561 (Vt. 1850).

22 Vt. 561 (Moses Buchanan & Co. v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blatchford v. Harris
115 Ill. App. 160 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)