Moser v. Matt
This text of 24 Ill. 198 (Moser v. Matt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see nothing in this case to take it out of the cases heretofore decided by this court. It is essential, a definite time shall be alleged for the completion of the work. We cannot imply a time. We adhere to the opinions and rulings in Cook v. Heald, 21 Ill. R. 425; Same v. Vreeland, ib. 431; Cook v. Rofinot, ib. 437; Senior v. Brebnor, 22 Ill. R. 252; McClurken et al. v. Logan et al., 23 ib. 79. We can see no difference in principle between the cases, and deem it useless to go again into the argument.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ill. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moser-v-matt-ill-1860.