Mosely v. State

49 So. 807, 161 Ala. 74, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 150
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 20, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 So. 807 (Mosely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosely v. State, 49 So. 807, 161 Ala. 74, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 150 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

The defendant was indicted under section 4792 of thé Code of 1896 (section 6983 of the Code of 1907). The only question presented is whether or not the playing was so near the public road that parties in or traveling the same could see and tell that they were playing cards. It is not sufficient that the players were seen and could be recognized; but could persons in the road see them playing cards? — Franklin v. State, 91 Ala. 23, 8 South. 678.

The state not only failed to prove that they were or could be seen playing cards, but both of its witnesses [75]*75testified that they were looking at the defendant and his companions and could not tell what they were doing. The defendant was in his own house, and was not guilty unless the playing was or could be seen from the public road, and the state’s witnesses were looking and could not see them playing. The trial court erred in not discharging the defendant, and the judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson, and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingram v. State
226 So. 2d 169 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 So. 807, 161 Ala. 74, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosely-v-state-ala-1909.