Mosely v. Mosely

259 S.E.2d 462, 244 Ga. 208, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1182
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 10, 1979·No. 35054·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

It appearing that the appellant has neither filed a brief nor appeared at oral argument in support of her enumeration of error, her appeal is hereby deemed abandoned and must be affirmed. Rule 45 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Georgia.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosely v. Mosely, 259 S.E.2d 462, 244 Ga. 208, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1182 (Ga. 1979).

259 S.E.2d 462 (Mosely v. Mosely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gossitt v. State
308 S.E.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Ward v. State
300 S.E.2d 193 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Henry v. State
290 S.E.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)