Moseley v. Evans

72 Ga. 203
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 23, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 Ga. 203 (Moseley v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moseley v. Evans, 72 Ga. 203 (Ga. 1883).

Opinion

1. Where it was sought to establish a copy in lieu of a lost will, and two of the three persons appearing as subscribing witnesses were sworn., in the absence of any attack on their credibility, evidence that they were men of good standing and entitled to credit, was inadmissible.

2. The person whose name appeared as the third subscribing witness not having been sworn as a witness, evidence that he was a man of bad character, was unworthy of belief, and had made certain statements in relation to the matter, was inadmissible.

3. Where a paper purporting to be a copy of a lost original will was sought to be, established and probated, the only evidence of the making of the will being the testimony of two of the persons whoso names appeared as subscribing witnesses, the third person whose name so appeared being in court, but not sworn, and there being no evidence to show the existence or the will after the death of the testator, or that the will, if any existed, was lost or destroyed, a verdict against the paper so propounded was proper. 70 Gci., 333.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Looney v. Looney
34 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Ga. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moseley-v-evans-ga-1883.