Mose Young v. Dee Joyce Hayes

266 F.3d 791, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3503
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 2001
Docket00-3900
StatusPublished

This text of 266 F.3d 791 (Mose Young v. Dee Joyce Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mose Young v. Dee Joyce Hayes, 266 F.3d 791, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3503 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

266 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2001)

MOSE YOUNG, APPELLANT,
v.
DEE JOYCE HAYES, CIRCUIT ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS IN HER INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND ALFRED D. LUEBBERS, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, APPELLEES.

No. 00-3900EM

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Filed: February 6, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before Richard S. Arnold, Beam, and Morris Sheppard Arnold, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as moot. The appellant's potential witness has obtained new employment and is no longer subject to the possibility of intimidation by the defendant. It was not an abuse of discretion for the District Court to decline to grant leave to amend the complaint to assert a claim for nominal damages.

The stay of execution previously entered by this Court is dissolved.

Let the mandate issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Hayes
266 F.3d 791 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F.3d 791, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mose-young-v-dee-joyce-hayes-ca8-2001.