Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States

563 F.2d 243, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10827

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 10, 1977

Docket77-1705

StatusPublished

This text of 563 F.2d 243 (Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States, 563 F.2d 243, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10827 (5th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The precise questions raised by Pearson on this appeal from denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief regarding the constitutionality of the searches of his mail have been already litigated and determined adversely to his contentions on his direct appeal. 517 F.2d 350 (1975). We reject petitioner’s attempt to impose upon us such a “purposeless duplication of the review process.” See Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The precise questions raised by Pearson on this appeal from denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief regarding the constitutionality of the searches of his mail have been already litigated and determined adversely to his contentions on his direct appeal. 517 F.2d 350 (1975). We reject petitioner’s attempt to impose upon us such a “purposeless duplication of the review process.” See Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 F.2d 243, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mose-franklin-pearson-v-united-states-ca5-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack