Moscowitz v. Moscowitz

256 A.D. 955, 10 N.Y.S.2d 147
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 955 (Moscowitz v. Moscowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moscowitz v. Moscowitz, 256 A.D. 955, 10 N.Y.S.2d 147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Judgment restraining the defendant husband from prosecuting an action for divorce in the State of New Jersey, etc., and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, reversed on the law, without costs, and a new trial granted. Plaintiff offered no evidence of the allegations in her complaint that the appellant is and continuously has been a resident of the State of New York. The evidence before us tends to establish that the appellant has been a resident of the State of New Jersey since May, 1935. We grant a new trial for the purpose of enabling plaintiff to offer any evidence she may have of the allegations of the complaint which have been denied and for further consideration of the local laws in respect to residence of employees whose compensation is paid solely or in part from funds of the city of New York. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dominick v. Dominick
26 Misc. 2d 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Hoenig v. Hoenig
24 Misc. 2d 1091 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 955, 10 N.Y.S.2d 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moscowitz-v-moscowitz-nyappdiv-1939.