Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.
264 A.D. 709, 34 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 A.D. 984 →
Opinion
Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents Paul Lucke, as conservator of the property of Moscow Fire Insurance Company, and Samuel E. Morro and others. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 264 A.D. 709, 34 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4250 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
264 A.D. 709 (Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.