Moscaritolo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moscaritolo v. State

99 So. 3d 608, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18255, 2012 WL 5034081

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 19, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-1190

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 3d 608 (Moscaritolo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moscaritolo v. State, 99 So. 3d 608, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18255, 2012 WL 5034081 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and withdraw our previously issued per curiam affirmance. Having considered the supplemental record filed in this matter and Appellant’s initial brief, we again affirm. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief.

[609]*609REHEARING GRANTED; AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and withdraw our previously issued per curiam affirmance. Having considered the supplemental record filed in this matter and Appellant’s initial brief, we again affirm. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief.

[609]*609REHEARING GRANTED; AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 3d 608, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18255, 2012 WL 5034081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moscaritolo-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.