Morvilius v. Delaware Circuit Court

171 N.E.2d 695, 241 Ind. 704, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 192
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1961·No. 0-622·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner has filed a pleading which he describes as a “Verified Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto in Forma Pauperis,” by which he evidently seeks to prosecute an appeal from a conviction in the Delaware Circuit Court for the criminal offense of “Failure to Provide.” Petitioner asserts that the Delaware Circuit Court was without jurisdiction for the reason that a suit for support is pending in the LaPorte Circuit Court.

The petition does not conform to any requirements of procedure of practice in this state. Since petitioner has elected to act as his own counsel, he must accept the consequences of his incompetence.

As nothing is properly before us by reason of this petition, the same is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 171 N. E. 2d 695.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morvilius v. Delaware Circuit Court, 171 N.E.2d 695, 241 Ind. 704, 1961 Ind. LEXIS 192 (Ind. 1961).

171 N.E.2d 695 (Morvilius v. Delaware Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilhoite v. Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc.
640 N.E.2d 382 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)
Terpstra v. State
529 N.E.2d 839 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants Bank
483 N.E.2d 749 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1985)