Morviani v. State

613 So. 2d 614, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2243, 1993 WL 48249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1993
DocketNo. 92-00318
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 613 So. 2d 614 (Morviani v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morviani v. State, 613 So. 2d 614, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2243, 1993 WL 48249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joey Morviani appeals a sentence imposed after multiple violations of probation. We affirm the sentence on the basis of Manuel v. State, 582 So.2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). In Manuel we held that “bumping” a guideline sentence one cell for violation of probation, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14), necessarily raises the “permitted range” by one cell also. Contrary to the position taken by Morviani in this appeal, we do not believe that Manuel is inconsistent with Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TERRY E. HUDSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Allen v. State
662 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 So. 2d 614, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2243, 1993 WL 48249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morviani-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.