Morton v. State
Opinion
This is the second appearance of this case in this court.1 In the [869]*869original appeal, Morton v. State, 206 Ga. App. 413 (425 SE2d 336) (1992), Albert W. Morton’s conviction was affirmed, but his sentence was vacated because, as the State conceded, it exceeded the range authorized by law for the offense. The case was remanded for resentencing only. On remand, the trial court imposed a sentence which is well within the range authorized by law for the offense.
In this reappearance of the case, Morton seeks to raise again the merits of his underlying conviction. These issues, having previously been decided against him, may not be raised and considered again.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
437 S.E.2d 839 (Morton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.