Morton v. State
This text of 45 S.E. 395 (Morton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence, while entirely circumstantial, was sufficient to support the conviction of the accused.
2. This being an accusation of simple larceny, and the evidence authorizing a finding that the stolen property was carried by the accused into the county where the accusation was sworn out, even if the actual theft was committed in another county, it was not error for the court to hold that the accused was guilty of larceny in the county where the accusation was sworn out. Penal Code, § 155; Green v. State, 114 Ga. 918.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.E. 395, 118 Ga. 306, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-state-ga-1903.