Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Morton v. State

Morton v. State

198 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035, 2016 WL 805172
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 2016
Docket2D14-4180
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 779 (Morton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morton v. State, 198 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035, 2016 WL 805172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Matthew Morton challenges his sentences for armed burglary, two counts of burglary of an occupied dwelling, burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, and two counts of burglary of an unoccupied conveyance. He claims that in sentencing him the court improperly considered evidence of an uncharged homicide which occurred during one of the burglaries. Applying the rationale and analysis set forth in Imbert v. State, 154 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 4th. DCA 2015), we affirm the sentences.

Affirmed. '

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierre Imbert v. State
154 So. 3d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035, 2016 WL 805172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.