Morton v. State
198 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035, 2016 WL 805172
Opinion
Matthew Morton challenges his sentences for armed burglary, two counts of burglary of an occupied dwelling, burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, and two counts of burglary of an unoccupied conveyance. He claims that in sentencing him the court improperly considered evidence of an uncharged homicide which occurred during one of the burglaries. Applying the rationale and analysis set forth in Imbert v. State, 154 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 4th. DCA 2015), we affirm the sentences.
Affirmed. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morton v. State, 198 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035, 2016 WL 805172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
198 So. 3d 779 (Morton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierre Imbert v. State
154 So. 3d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)