Morton v. Rinker Material Corp.

753 So. 2d 768, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3448, 2000 WL 296557
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2000·No. No. 1D99-1988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

We are unable to conclusively determine that, at the time the judge of compensation claims entered the order compelling an independent medical examination by a physician outside the managed care network, no dispute existed concerning provision of indemnity benefits. See Wiggins v. B & L Services, Inc., 701 So.2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is DENIED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton v. Rinker Material Corp., 753 So. 2d 768, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3448, 2000 WL 296557 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

753 So. 2d 768 (Morton v. Rinker Material Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kohout v. Benefit Administrators
781 So. 2d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Claims Management, Inc. v. Grenier
777 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)