Morton v. Morton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morton v. Morton

476 So. 2d 749, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2347, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16199

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1985

DocketNo. 85-299

StatusPublished

This text of 476 So. 2d 749 (Morton v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Morton, 476 So. 2d 749, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2347, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16199 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order which set aside findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the general master after a hearing on the wife’s motion for contempt. The trial court’s stated basis, an alleged “inconsistency on the face of the report,” is manifestly erroneous. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to have rejected the master’s report and his recommended disposition. See Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order which set aside findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the general master after a hearing on the wife’s motion for contempt. The trial court’s stated basis, an alleged “inconsistency on the face of the report,” is manifestly erroneous. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to have rejected the master’s report and his recommended disposition. See Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 So. 2d 749, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2347, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-morton-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack