Morton v. Morton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morton v. Morton

227 So. 2d 84

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1969

DocketNo. 69-70

StatusPublished

This text of 227 So. 2d 84 (Morton v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Morton, 227 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Involved in this litigation is the validity of certain inter vivos trusts which were irrevocable. The trial judge held the trusts valid and determined the interests of the beneficiaries.

We find this ruling without error and affirm. See: Reid v. Barry, 93 Fla. 849, 112 So. 846; Cooey v. Cooey, 132 Fla. 716, 182 So. 202; § 689.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; 33 Fla.Jur., Trusts, §§ 12, 14; Bogart, Trusts & Trustees, 2d ed., §§ 63, 81, 149; Perry on Trusts, 7th ed., §§ 78, 81, 82, 96, 100.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Involved in this litigation is the validity of certain inter vivos trusts which were irrevocable. The trial judge held the trusts valid and determined the interests of the beneficiaries.

We find this ruling without error and affirm. See: Reid v. Barry, 93 Fla. 849, 112 So. 846; Cooey v. Cooey, 132 Fla. 716, 182 So. 202; § 689.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; 33 Fla.Jur., Trusts, §§ 12, 14; Bogart, Trusts & Trustees, 2d ed., §§ 63, 81, 149; Perry on Trusts, 7th ed., §§ 78, 81, 82, 96, 100.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 So. 2d 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-morton-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack