Morton v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF TP. OF CLARK
This text of 260 A.2d 5 (Morton v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF TP. OF CLARK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RAYMOND W. MORTON, RICHARD M. SHOFI, AND SOUTHWEST CIVIC ASSOCIATION OF CLARK, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN UNION COUNTY, AND THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, AND MABROOK GARDENS, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENING DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT. MABROOK GARDENS, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN UNION COUNTY, AND THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEWIS and MATTHEWS.
Mr. Norman A. Kurtz argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent Mabrook Gardens (Messrs. Levy & Krauss, attorneys).
Mr. John P. Higgins argued the cause for municipal defendants-cross-respondents (Mr. H. Frank Pettit, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Feller's comprehensive opinion, partially reproduced in 102 N.J. Super. 84 (Law Div. 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.2d 5, 108 N.J. Super. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-mayor-and-council-of-tp-of-clark-njsuperctappdiv-1969.