Morton v. Mastan Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morton v. Mastan Co.

181 So. 2d 575

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 1966

DocketNo. 65-425

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 So. 2d 575 (Morton v. Mastan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Mastan Co., 181 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715, and approved in Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; i. e., after the movant has offered sufficient admissible evidence to support his claim of the nonexistence of a genuine issue as to any material fact, the party moved against by summary judgment must come forward with facts contradicting those submitted by the movant and demonstrating a real issue between the parties.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715, and approved in Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; i. e., after the movant has offered sufficient admissible evidence to support his claim of the nonexistence of a genuine issue as to any material fact, the party moved against by summary judgment must come forward with facts contradicting those submitted by the movant and demonstrating a real issue between the parties.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 So. 2d 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-mastan-co-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack