Morton v. Mastan Co.
181 So. 2d 575
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1966·No. No. 65-425·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715, and approved in Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; i. e., after the movant has offered sufficient admissible evidence to support his claim of the nonexistence of a genuine issue as to any material fact, the party moved against by summary judgment must come forward with facts contradicting those submitted by the movant and demonstrating a real issue between the parties.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morton v. Mastan Co., 181 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
181 So. 2d 575 (Morton v. Mastan Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.
334 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
John B. Reid & Associates, Inc. v. Jimenez
181 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)