Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

20 Ohio C.C. 666
CourtHancock Circuit Court
DecidedMay 15, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. 666 (Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hancock Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co., 20 Ohio C.C. 666 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Opinion

SENEY, J.

There was.nothing in the contract between Morton and the railroad company whereby the latter acquired a title to the ticket because it was in the hands of a third person. The most the conductor could do would be to refuse to accept the ticket from the third party aDd collect, the regular fare. Morton pur- . chased the b'pok, and the title to the sanie passed from the railroad com'pany when it was sold. , ,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ohio C.C. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-lake-erie-western-railway-co-ohcircthancock-1898.