Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

Hancock Circuit Court

Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

20 Ohio C.C. 666

Hancock Circuit Court·Decided May 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

SENEY, J.

There was.nothing in the contract between Morton and the railroad company whereby the latter acquired a title to the ticket because it was in the hands of a third person. The most the conductor could do would be to refuse to accept the ticket from the third party aDd collect, the regular fare. Morton pur- . chased the b'pok, and the title to the sanie passed from the railroad com'pany when it was sold. , ,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SENEY, J.

There was.nothing in the contract between Morton and the railroad company whereby the latter acquired a title to the ticket because it was in the hands of a third person. The most the conductor could do would be to refuse to accept the ticket from the third party aDd collect, the regular fare. Morton pur- . chased the b'pok, and the title to the sanie passed from the railroad com'pany when it was sold. , ,.

Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co., 20 Ohio C.C. 666 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

20 Ohio C.C. 666 (Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.