Morton v. Harrington

190 So. 2d 625
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1966·No. No. 65-1030·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the opinion and mandate of this court in Morton v. Perkins, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 796, the appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, instituted an action against the appellee sounding in tort claiming a misrepresentation by her to the plaintiff in making a real estate listing. The matter came on for trial and, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the trial' court directed a verdict for the defendant. This appeal ensued. We affirm.

A review of the record fails to disclose any representation by the appellee to the plaintiff which would constitute a listing and, therefore, the action of the trial judge was. correct. See: City Builders’ Finance Co. v. Stahl, 90 Fla. 357, 106 So. 77; Howell v. Blackburn, 100 Fla. 114, 129 So. 341; Hanover Realty Corp. v. Codomo, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 420; 5 Fla.Jur., Brokers, §§ 15, 32.

The final judgment here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton v. Harrington, 190 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

190 So. 2d 625 (Morton v. Harrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanover Realty Corp. v. Codomo
95 So. 2d 420 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
City Builders Finance Co. v. Stahl
106 So. 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Howell v. Blackburn
129 So. 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Morton v. Perkins
163 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)