Morton v. Gelvan
151 So. 2d 866, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3587
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1963·No. No. 62-533·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant, counterplaintiff, appeals a final judgment for plaintiff entered after a non-jury trial. He bases his appeal on (1) the refusal of the trial judge to admit a certain letter into evidence, and (2) alleged prejudicial remarks by appellees’ trial counsel.
The refusal to admit the letter proffered is sustained upon authority of Green v. Hood, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 223, 227. The alleged prejudicial remarks, having been made during a non-jury trial, are not of sufficient weight to require reversal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morton v. Gelvan, 151 So. 2d 866, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).
151 So. 2d 866 (Morton v. Gelvan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Inmont Corp. v. International Printing & Graphic Communications Union
374 N.E.2d 176 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1977)