Morton v. Gelvan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morton v. Gelvan

151 So. 2d 866, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3587

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 1963

DocketNo. 62-533

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 So. 2d 866 (Morton v. Gelvan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Gelvan, 151 So. 2d 866, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, counterplaintiff, appeals a final judgment for plaintiff entered after a non-jury trial. He bases his appeal on (1) the refusal of the trial judge to admit a certain letter into evidence, and (2) alleged prejudicial remarks by appellees’ trial counsel.

The refusal to admit the letter proffered is sustained upon authority of Green v. Hood, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 223, 227. The alleged prejudicial remarks, having been made during a non-jury trial, are not of sufficient weight to require reversal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, counterplaintiff, appeals a final judgment for plaintiff entered after a non-jury trial. He bases his appeal on (1) the refusal of the trial judge to admit a certain letter into evidence, and (2) alleged prejudicial remarks by appellees’ trial counsel.

The refusal to admit the letter proffered is sustained upon authority of Green v. Hood, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 223, 227. The alleged prejudicial remarks, having been made during a non-jury trial, are not of sufficient weight to require reversal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 2d 866, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-gelvan-fladistctapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack