Morton v. Fahey
117 F. App'x 274
Opinion
Rodney Morton appeals the district court’s order denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000), on his complaint challenging matters concerning his parole file. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Morton v. Fahey, No. CA-04-428-1 (E.D.Va. July 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morton v. Fahey, 117 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2004).
117 F. App'x 274 (Morton v. Fahey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)