Morton v. Fahey
This text of Morton v. Fahey (Morton v. Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7249
RODNEY MORTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Pardon & Parole Board; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-428-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Morton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rodney Morton appeals the district court’s order denying
relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000), on his complaint
challenging matters concerning his parole file. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Morton v. Fahey, No. CA-
04-428-1 (E.D. Va. July 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morton v. Fahey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-fahey-ca4-2004.