Morton v. Carolina Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Morton v. Carolina Manufacturing Co.

20 S.E. 460, 115 N.C. 198

DecidedSeptember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.E. 460 (Morton v. Carolina Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Carolina Manufacturing Co., 20 S.E. 460, 115 N.C. 198 (N.C. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Buewell, J.:

There is a dispute between appellant Ragan, who was a bidder at a sale made by receivers, and those receivers, as to what property was offered for sale by them when he made his bid — as to what was sold by them and bought by him at that time. No exception was taken because his Honor did not set out the facts found by him as a basis of his decree, but we take it that he found the statements made by the receivers and their witnesses to be true. We have no authority, we think, to review his conclusions upon such a matter. The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buewell, J.:

There is a dispute between appellant Ragan, who was a bidder at a sale made by receivers, and those receivers, as to what property was offered for sale by them when he made his bid — as to what was sold by them and bought by him at that time. No exception was taken because his Honor did not set out the facts found by him as a basis of his decree, but we take it that he found the statements made by the receivers and their witnesses to be true. We have no authority, we think, to review his conclusions upon such a matter. The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E. 460, 115 N.C. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-carolina-manufacturing-co-nc-1894.