Morton v. Boyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morton v. Boyd

25 So. 3d 1293, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1130, 2010 WL 391840

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 2010

Docket2D08-5207

StatusPublished

This text of 25 So. 3d 1293 (Morton v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton v. Boyd, 25 So. 3d 1293, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1130, 2010 WL 391840 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Jack Morton, Alexander J. Debay, and Tea Lake Investments, LLC, seek review of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Alan D. and Korene R. Boyd based on a proposal for settlement. The Boyds properly concede that reversal is required because this court reversed the underlying final summary judgment in Morton v. Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund, Inc., — So.3d - (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Reversed.

ALTENBERND and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Jack Morton, Alexander J. Debay, and Tea Lake Investments, LLC, seek review of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Alan D. and Korene R. Boyd based on a proposal for settlement. The Boyds properly concede that reversal is required because this court reversed the underlying final summary judgment in Morton v. Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund, Inc., — So.3d - (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Reversed.

ALTENBERND and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 So. 3d 1293, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1130, 2010 WL 391840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-v-boyd-fladistctapp-2010.