Morton Sobell v. United States

378 F.2d 674, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5836
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morton Sobell v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 F.2d 180
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 26, 1967·No. 31259·Published

Opinion

378 F.2d 674

Morton SOBELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 507, Docket 31259.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 15, 1967.
Decided June 26, 1967.

Marshall Perlin, New York City (William M. Kunstler and Arthur Kinoy, New York City, Malcolm Sharp, Albuquerque, N.M., Benjamin O. Dreyfus, San Francisco, Cal., and Vern Countryman, Lexington, Mass., on the brief), for appellant.

Robert L. King, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Stephen F. Williams, Daniel R. Murdock and Michael W. Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Attys., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and McLEAN, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The order of the district court denying the petition without a hearing is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Weinfeld, 264 F.Supp. 579 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

1

Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton Sobell v. United States, 378 F.2d 674, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5836 (2d Cir. 1967).

378 F.2d 674 (Morton Sobell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sobell v. United States
264 F. Supp. 579 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Sobell v. United States
378 F.2d 674 (Second Circuit, 1967)