Morton Karten, Inc. v. Snow Suit, Skiwear, Leggings & Infant's Novelty Wear Worker's Union, Local 105

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morton Karten, Inc. v. Snow Suit, Skiwear, Leggings & Infant's Novelty Wear Worker's Union, Local 105

17 A.D.2d 653, 230 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 653 (Morton Karten, Inc. v. Snow Suit, Skiwear, Leggings & Infant's Novelty Wear Worker's Union, Local 105) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morton Karten, Inc. v. Snow Suit, Skiwear, Leggings & Infant's Novelty Wear Worker's Union, Local 105, 17 A.D.2d 653, 230 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In two proceedings to stay arbitration under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, petitioner appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated June 6, 1961, which denied its applications to vacate notices and demands for arbitration and to stay [654]*654the arbitration proceedings. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The record establishes that there was compliance with the grievance procedure prescribed in paragraph “ Forty-Eighth ” of the collective agreement. The complaints filed by the respondent unions involve arbitrable issues. We pass upon no other question. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two proceedings to stay arbitration under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, petitioner appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated June 6, 1961, which denied its applications to vacate notices and demands for arbitration and to stay [654]*654the arbitration proceedings. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The record establishes that there was compliance with the grievance procedure prescribed in paragraph “ Forty-Eighth ” of the collective agreement. The complaints filed by the respondent unions involve arbitrable issues. We pass upon no other question. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 653, 230 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-karten-inc-v-snow-suit-skiwear-leggings-infants-novelty-wear-nyappdiv-1962.