Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams

Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams

59 S.E.2d 358, 232 N.C. 96, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 407
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 10, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 59 S.E.2d 358 (Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams, 59 S.E.2d 358, 232 N.C. 96, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 407 (N.C. 1950).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

While it appears from careful reading and consideration of the matters set up in defendant’s further defense that there are averments of fraud, it is manifest that these averments are insufficient to state a cause of action against plaintiff for actionable fraud. And what the effect of the averments is in respect of the lessees and their assignee is a matter foreign to the issue between plaintiff and defendant. Hence in the order striking the further defense, no error is made to appear.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh
155 S.E.2d 543 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Miller v. First National Bank
67 S.E.2d 362 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Miller v. First National Bank of Catawba County
67 S.E.2d 362 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E.2d 358, 232 N.C. 96, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-g-thalhimer-inc-v-abrams-nc-1950.