Morton ex rel. Morton v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
This text of 557 So. 2d 891 (Morton ex rel. Morton v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Bobby L. Morton, filed suit for damages arising out of personal injuries sustained when an escalator located on the premises of appellee, Sears Roebuck and Co., suddenly stopped. Appellant contends that genuine issues of material fact exist as to the negligence of appellee, Sears Roebuck and Co. We agree and reverse. See Burns v. Otis Elevator Co., 550 So.2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Biancki v. Garber, 528 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). We find no merit in the points raised by Westinghouse Electric Corporation in its cross-appeal.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 891, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1030, 1990 WL 14250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morton-ex-rel-morton-v-sears-roebuck-co-fladistctapp-1990.