Mortimer v. State
This text of 490 So. 2d 93 (Mortimer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*94 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eric Wm. Hendon, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee Ruska Pelzman and Nancy Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We hold that notations on a guidelines sentencing score sheet will not suffice as a written order stating reasons to enhance a sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), Reichman v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mortimer-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.