Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mortimer v. State

Mortimer v. State

490 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1986·No. 85-504·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

490 So.2d 93 (1986)

Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-504.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 18, 1986.

*94 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eric Wm. Hendon, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee Ruska Pelzman and Nancy Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that notations on a guidelines sentencing score sheet will not suffice as a written order stating reasons to enhance a sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), Reichman v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mortimer v. State, 490 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

490 So. 2d 93 (Mortimer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
524 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Barnes v. State
519 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Lemon
517 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hipp v. State
509 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hernandez v. State
501 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Knight v. State
501 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Viera v. State
490 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)