Mortimer, R. v. McCool, M.
This text of Mortimer, R. v. McCool, M. (Mortimer, R. v. McCool, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 37 - 2020 38 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 19 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MICHAEL ANDREW MCCOOL, RAYMOND : CHRISTIAN MCCOOL, ESTATE OF : RAYMOND R. MCCOOL AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : : Respondents :
RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 20 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : 340 ASSOCIATES, LLC AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is: Whether, in this matter of first impression, the Supreme Court should adopt the “enterprise theory” or “single entity” theory of piercing the corporate veil to prevent injustice when two or more sister companies operate as a single corporate combine?
[19 MAL 2020 and 20 MAL 2020] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mortimer, R. v. McCool, M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mortimer-r-v-mccool-m-pa-2020.