Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 22, 2020·No. 20 MAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 37 - 2020 38 - 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 19 MAL 2020 :

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

MICHAEL ANDREW MCCOOL, RAYMOND : CHRISTIAN MCCOOL, ESTATE OF : RAYMOND R. MCCOOL AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : :

Respondents :

RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 20 MAL 2020 :

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

340 ASSOCIATES, LLC AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : :

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether, in this matter of first impression, the Supreme Court should adopt the “enterprise theory” or “single entity” theory of piercing the corporate veil to prevent injustice when two or more sister companies operate as a single corporate combine?

[19 MAL 2020 and 20 MAL 2020] - 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC, (Pa. 2020).

Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC (Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.