Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 37 - 2020 38 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 19 MAL 2020 :
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :
MICHAEL ANDREW MCCOOL, RAYMOND : CHRISTIAN MCCOOL, ESTATE OF : RAYMOND R. MCCOOL AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : :
Respondents :
RYAN FELL MORTIMER, : No. 20 MAL 2020 :
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :
340 ASSOCIATES, LLC AND MCCOOL : PROPERTIES, LLC, : :
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether, in this matter of first impression, the Supreme Court should adopt the “enterprise theory” or “single entity” theory of piercing the corporate veil to prevent injustice when two or more sister companies operate as a single corporate combine?
[19 MAL 2020 and 20 MAL 2020] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC (Mortimer, R. v. 340 Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.